ADJUDICATION NO:09/A/2025 – CITY OF CAPE TOWN VS eNCA – NEWS

Complaint that a news item was untrue, unverified and the subsequent apology was inadequate by not specifying what was being apologised for, which parties were affected, and that the apology was not broadcast on all platforms where the news item appeared. CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION

By |2025-05-18T10:47:03+02:00May 18th, 2025|E-TV|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO:09/A/2025 – CITY OF CAPE TOWN VS eNCA – NEWS

ADJUDICATION NO:07/A/2025, VAN VUUREN vs eNCA – HATE SPEECH

A complaint has been lodged with the BCCSA against eNCA’s Power to Truth with specific reference to Dr Thabane’s “JJ’s Rant” opening monologue segment. The issue to be determined is whether comments made relating to land expropriation and those in its political discourse are hate speech in terms of the Code. CLICK TO VIEW FULL [...]

By |2025-04-01T09:55:52+02:00April 1st, 2025|E-TV|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO:07/A/2025, VAN VUUREN vs eNCA – HATE SPEECH

ADJUDICATION NO: 05/A/2025 – SCHOEMAN, GOUWS AND HAMMAN vs eNCA – HATE SPEECH

Complaints about a television morning show where the presenters’ remarks contained alleged hate speech, discrimination, reinforcement of racial tensions, derogatory speech, reinforcement of negative stereotypes, and more. CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION 

By |2025-04-01T09:53:01+02:00April 1st, 2025|E-TV|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 05/A/2025 – SCHOEMAN, GOUWS AND HAMMAN vs eNCA – HATE SPEECH

CASE NUMBER: 19/2024 e.tv vs Gray – Balance

This is an application for leave to appeal in terms of Rule 3.14 of the Procedures against the finding and sanction imposed in Adjudication No: 30/A/2024 which was handed down on 8 0ctober 2024. The adjudicator found that Clause 12 of the Free-to-Air Code of Conduct had been contravened. CLICK TO VIEW FULL JUDGMENT [...]

By |2025-01-15T07:40:26+02:00November 30th, 2024|E-TV, Uncategorized|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 19/2024 e.tv vs Gray – Balance

ADJUDICATION NO: 32/A/2024 -THE BUTTERFLY HAVEN (PTY) LTD AND UBERRIMA PHOENIX (PTY) LTD, T/A UBERIMMA PHOENIX TRUST MANAGEMENT – BALANCE

Complaint that the broadcast insert was offensive, did not give the Complainants a right of reply to the criticism aired, and that it constituted a misrepresentation of crucial facts. CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION  

By |2024-11-11T08:30:49+02:00November 11th, 2024|E-TV|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 32/A/2024 -THE BUTTERFLY HAVEN (PTY) LTD AND UBERRIMA PHOENIX (PTY) LTD, T/A UBERIMMA PHOENIX TRUST MANAGEMENT – BALANCE

ADJUDICATION NO: 30/A/2024 – GRAY – COMMENT

That it is inaccurate for the Broadcaster to state in its broadcast that the Mogale City Municipal Manager, Mr Msezana was appointed by the Democratic Alliance. CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION

By |2024-11-11T09:04:15+02:00October 17th, 2024|E-TV|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 30/A/2024 – GRAY – COMMENT

CASE NUMBER: 15/2024 – APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL ADJUDICATION – 25/A/2025 – BALANCE

The first applicant alleges that ‘The Devi Show’ severely distorted and misrepresented facts regarding his involvement in illegal activities related to scrapping vehicles and selling engines. The applicant also alleges an infringement of his privacy.  The second applicant’s grounds of appeal are similar to that of the first applicant except the ground of appeal that [...]

By |2024-11-11T08:59:59+02:00October 11th, 2024|E-TV|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 15/2024 – APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL ADJUDICATION – 25/A/2025 – BALANCE

ADJUDICATION NO: 25/A/2024 – NATASEN AND NAIDOO OBO ANTHUS SERVICES 84 (PTY) LTD/ RTRP – BALANCE

The complainant alleges that ‘The Devi Show’ severely distorted and misrepresented facts regarding his involvement in illegal activities related to scrapping vehicles and selling engines.    CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION

By |2024-11-11T08:56:01+02:00August 16th, 2024|E-TV|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 25/A/2024 – NATASEN AND NAIDOO OBO ANTHUS SERVICES 84 (PTY) LTD/ RTRP – BALANCE

CASE NUMBER: 08/2024 – KWASIZABANTU MISSION VS eNCA – RIGHT OF REPLY

This application for leave to appeal is adjudicated in terms of Rules 6.1.4 of the Procedures. The application is brought against the Registrar’s refusal to entertain the Applicant’s complaint lodged against a programme Judged for Yourself, that had been broadcast by the Respondent on 29 February 2024 which was the Applicant’s second complaint against the [...]

By |2024-06-04T11:05:56+02:00June 4th, 2024|E-TV, Uncategorized|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 08/2024 – KWASIZABANTU MISSION VS eNCA – RIGHT OF REPLY
Go to Top