About the BCCSA
POPI ACT – CONSENT – SEE RULE 8 OF THE BCCSA’S PROCEDURE
The Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa (BCCSA) was established by the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) in 1993 and recognised by the Independent Broadcasting Authority (IBA) in 1995 in terms of section 56(2) of the IBA Act 1993 as a formal tribunal. The IBA Act was repealed by the Electronic Communications Act 36 of 2005. The BCCSA is now recognised by the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) as a formal tribunal in terms of section 54(3) of Act 36 of 2005.
Latest Judgments
Broadcasters who are members of the NAB adhere to the Code of Conduct for Free-to-Air Licensees, the Code of Conduct for Subscription Broadcasting Service Licensees and the Code for Online Services which are all enforced by the BCCSA. Broadcasters who are not members of the NAB fall under the jurisdiction of the Complaints and Compliance Committee (CCC) of ICASA.
The Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa is an independent, domestic, administrative tribunal that ensures that broadcasters who are members of the NAB comply with the Codes of Conduct relating to broadcasting (radio and television) as well as online content for signatories that offer online content services. According to its Constitution, the BCCSA is a voluntary association. The BCCSA is capable of suing and being sued in its corporate name; performing all such acts as are necessary for or incidental to the carrying out of its objectives; and for the performance of its functions and duties under this Constitution. The BCCSA comprises 9 part-time members: a Chairperson and 8 Commissioners. Three full-time staff are employed in the Johannesburg office: a Registrar, a Secretary and a Complaints Manager.
The BCCSA is subject to the Constitution of South Africa, in particular section 16, which protects the right to freedom of expression. Although freedom of expression lies at the foundation of our democracy, it is not an absolute right and there are boundaries to exercising free speech in South Africa’s constitutional state. The BCCSA therefore strives to find a balance between freedom of expression – which includes the right of the viewer/listener to receive information – and the individual’s rights to dignity and privacy. The BCCSA’s approach to enforcing the Codes of Conduct (Codes) applicable to broadcasters is underpinned by South Africa’s constitutional values.
Since its inception, the BCCSA has believed that broadcasters should provide enough information about the content of a programme in order to enable the viewer/listener to make an informed decision about whether or not to watch or listen to a programme. As such, warnings about age restriction and programme content are prescribed in the Codes.
The Codes also contain extensive provisions aimed at protecting children from harmful content, which are strictly enforced. A system of age restrictions and a “watershed” rule has been developed to enable parents to make informed decisions regarding the programmes their children may watch.
While editorial independency remains the prerogative of the broadcaster, the news clauses in the Codes speak specifically to the requirement of fair and unbiased coverage. The Codes stipulate that broadcasting service licensees which will also apply to online content services must report news truthfully, accurately and fairly, in the correct context and in a fair manner, without intentional or negligent departure from the facts. The manner in which comment and controversial issues of public importance are to be presented is also prescribed in the respective Codes.
The BCCSA has no jurisdiction in election matters; these complaints fall within the purview of the CCC of ICASA.
ADJUDICATION NO: 28/A/2025 – ISON XPERIENCES (PTY) LTD VS KAYA FM – DIGNITY
Complaint that call-in programme allegedly contained unsubstantiated and one-sided allegations which damaged Complainant’s reputation – aired without any attempt to verify the accuracy of the claims or to offer a...
Read MoreADJUDICATION NO: 27/A/2025 O’SULLIVAN VS SABC SAFM – HATE SPEECH
Complaint that the presenter’s allegedly offensive comment constituted hate speech in that it was racist and derogatory, reinforcing a negative stereotype. CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION
Read MoreADJUDICATION NO:26 /A/2025 GAUTENG DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 – COMMENT
A complaint was lodged with the BCCSA against MultiChoice Channel 157 for broadcasting an allegedly incorrect, unverified and misleading episode of Zimoja News on 8 September 2025. CLICK TO VIEW...
Read MoreADJUDICATION NO: 25/A/2025 CHAMES VS 567 CAPE TALK- NEWS
A complaint was lodged with the BCCSA against Cape Talk for broadcasting an alleged unverified, untrue and incorrect news insert twice on 8 October 2025 at 12h00 and 14h00. CLICK...
Read MoreCASE NUMBER: 13/2025 MPHUTHI VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 – HATE SPEECH BASED ON GENDER
The Complainant held the view that the continued broadcast of the programme despite the huge public uproar throughout the years constituted incitement to cause harm. The Respondent presented hate speech...
Read MoreCASE NUMBER: 08/2025 – CMR NOORD GOLD FOR LIVE VS M-NET (CART BLANCHE) – BALANCE
Complaint that the complainant’s response to allegations of misconduct regarding the placement of children was not fairly reflected. Participants’ comments complied with clause 28.2 of the Code. Complainant was offered...
Read MoreADJUDICATION NO: 23/A/2025 – SITHOLE VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 – PRIVACY AND DIGNITY
A complaint was lodged by Mr Sithole (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Pastor’) with the BCCSA against MultiChoice (hereinafter referred to ‘the Broadcaster’) Channel 157, regarding an episode of Fake...
Read MoreADJUDICATION NO: 22/A/2025, DE BEER VS M-NET, CARTE BLANCHE – BALANCE
A complaint was lodged with the BCCSA by Ms. De Beer against a Carte Blanche episode aired on 4th May 2025 at 19:00. The programme interrogated the placement of children...
Read More