Af
ter viewing the Respondent’s segment about the Sandvlei Community’s concern regarding the spillage of raw sewage into the Kuils River by the Zandvliet Water Treatment Works managed by the Complainant – including going through all the supplementary affidavits alleged to contain information which would bring balance to the broadcast had the Respondent utilised its content – further considering the fact that the Complainant was given ample opportunity to state their side – the Tribunal concluded that the Respondent did not contravene the provisions of clauses 28(2) and 28(3) respectively.
