ADJUDICATION NO: 14/A/2023 – PILLAY VS KFM – DIGNITY

Complaint that a prank call posted on broadcaster’s website depicted incorrect facts; ‘body shaming’ and sexual suggestions (transgression of dignity); invasion of privacy (published without permission); defamation (damaging of reputation); making receiver feel harassed and uncomfortable. Clause 15(1) CLICK TO VIEW FULL JUDGMENT

By |2023-08-04T12:52:51+02:00August 4th, 2023|KFM|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 14/A/2023 – PILLAY VS KFM – DIGNITY

CASE NO: 03/2013 – ALLDERMAN VS KFM – NEWS

A complaint that a news item was one-sided was not upheld by the BCCSA Tribunal. The decision was based on the fact that balance was achieved in later newscasts which dealt with the subject as it developed. [2013] JOL 30033 (BCCSA) CLICK TO VIEW FULL JUDGMENT 

By |2017-01-27T11:46:52+02:00May 22nd, 2015|KFM|Comments Off on CASE NO: 03/2013 – ALLDERMAN VS KFM – NEWS

CASE NO: 30/2011 – COX VS KFM – NEWS

Complaint that the omission of a reference in a news bulletin to the presence of foreign forces in Pakistan amounted to a contravention of the Broadcasting Code not upheld.   The Tribunal was not convinced that the broadcaster intentionally omitted to refer to the presence of American or other foreign forces in Pakistan. It was stated [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:31+02:00March 12th, 2015|KFM|Comments Off on CASE NO: 30/2011 – COX VS KFM – NEWS

CASE NUMBER: 15/2006 – SWANEPOEL VS KFM – DEROGATORY TERM

Complaint about a comment made by a presenter on KFM Radio Station.  Listeners  phoned in to participate in a competition where they could choose whether they wanted the soft option, a guaranteed prize, or wanted to answer a question with the possibility of winning a bigger prize. When a participant chose the ‘safe option”, she [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:44+02:00March 10th, 2015|KFM, Uncategorized|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 15/2006 – SWANEPOEL VS KFM – DEROGATORY TERM
Go to Top