CASE NO: 27/2/2012 – 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO VS STEVENS – APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION

Application for condonation for late filing of application for leave to appeal. Complainant and Respondent entitled to certainty as to judgment of BCCSA. Strict compliance required except where special circumstances are shown. Misunderstanding or ignorance of the Rules not in itself a ground for condonation. Judgments of the BCCSA do not attain validity on publication, [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:12+02:00April 2nd, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 27/2/2012 – 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO VS STEVENS – APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION

CASE NO: 31/2012 – STEVENS VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – CHILDREN

Guideline to broadcasters:   The footage, which includes the audio soundtrack, probably amounts to  child pornography, which in terms of the Films and Publications Act 1996 may not be possessed or distributed. Distribution would include distribution of the footage in its entirety, as well as the visuals and/or the audio soundtrack individually, by way of the electronic [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:14+02:00April 1st, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 31/2012 – STEVENS VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – CHILDREN

CASE NO: 26/2012 – NAICKER VS 947 HIGHVELD STEREO AND TALK RADIO 702 – DEFAMATION

The Broadcasting Tribunal held that the facts available to the Respondent radio stations did not justify their implicating the complainant in a murder on the meager facts available to it. This amounted to a contravention of the rules pertaining to News and defamation. A passage in judgment reads as follows: “In the result we hold [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:21+02:00April 1st, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 26/2012 – NAICKER VS 947 HIGHVELD STEREO AND TALK RADIO 702 – DEFAMATION

CASE NO: 27/2012 – VISSER AND THOMSON VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – HATE SPEECH

The complainants argued that reference to persons who have undergone a sex change operation as “it’ was demeaning and unacceptable. The Tribunal accepted this argument but held that the word used did not, in the circumstances, amount to hate speech based on gender. The elements of advocacy and incitement were absent.  Although the broadcaster correctly [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:22+02:00April 1st, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 27/2012 – VISSER AND THOMSON VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – HATE SPEECH

CASE NO: 35/2011 – SHARPLES & ANOTHER VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – NEWS

The Registrar received two complaints from two Listeners: one against the 702’s EWN and the other against 94.7 Highveld Stereo about the same news item, with a clip of a scream in agony played during their News. An Adjudicator of the Commission held that the material complained of did not amount to a contravention of [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:32+02:00March 12th, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 35/2011 – SHARPLES & ANOTHER VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – NEWS

CASE NO: 04/2010 – MARE VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – CHILDREN – SONG LYRICS

Complaint about the broadcasting of a song called “Russian Roulette” by the artist Rihanna.  The Complainant is concerned about the effect that the song might have on young and impressionable minds.  The Complainant failed to submit the date and time on which she heard the song.  She obtained a schedule of broadcasting from the Respondent [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:37+02:00March 12th, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 04/2010 – MARE VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – CHILDREN – SONG LYRICS

CASE NO: 16/2010 – BARREIRA VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – DEROGATORY TERM

A complaint was received that by using the word “Porra”, the presenters of the “Rude awakening” had a go at the Portuguese community.  They alleged that the use of the word was offensive and uncalled for.  It appeared that in Brazilian Portuguese “Porra” is used as an expletive. It can also mean “semen”.  The Tribunal [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:41+02:00March 10th, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 16/2010 – BARREIRA VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – DEROGATORY TERM

CASE NO: 24/2010 – NAIDOO VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – HATE SPEECH

A broadcast by the Respondent included a satirical sketch by a stand- up comedian with an audience. The sketch included jokes which included the term “coolie”. The Tribunal held that the word “coolie”, given its historical apartheid context, amounted to a serious invasion of dignity by way of hate speech based on race and that [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:42+02:00March 10th, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 24/2010 – NAIDOO VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – HATE SPEECH

CASE NO: 31/2010 – SMIT VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – HATE SPEECH

Complaint about alleged indirect hate speech by use of the word moffie in a song, allegedly causing uncomfortable questions from children and allegedly perpetuating discrimination against homosexual people. Complainant concerned that resultant negative attitudes regarding non-heterosexual lifestyle may lead to homophobic behaviour, such as homophobic jokes, physical attacks, discrimination in the workplace and media representation.  [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:43+02:00March 10th, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NO: 31/2010 – SMIT VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – HATE SPEECH

CASE NUMBER: 05/2007 – DU PLESSIS VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – CHILDREN

Complaint that joke with sexual innuendo (pun about “huwelik”) that was broadcast on “The rude awakening” show at about 08:10 on a weekday morning during school term was offensive and a contravention of the Broadcasting Code.  The Tribunal found that at that time of a weekday morning large numbers of children are not part of [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:45+02:00February 19th, 2015|947|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 05/2007 – DU PLESSIS VS 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – CHILDREN
Go to Top