About user-bccsa

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far user-bccsa has created 974 blog entries.

ADJUDICATION NO: 08/A/2026 – MAHOMED VS 702 – HATE SPEECH

A complaint was lodged with the BCCSA against 702’s Breakfast Show with Bongani Bingwa that was broadcast on 2 March 2026 at 08.25.  The Show allegedly did not comply with the BCCSA’s Code of Conduct and included a statement that contained blasphemy and hate speech based on religion. CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION

By |2026-04-16T09:39:31+02:00April 16th, 2026|702|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 08/A/2026 – MAHOMED VS 702 – HATE SPEECH

ADJUDICATION NO: 07/A/2026 – HERBERT VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 171 – WATERSHED

A complaint was lodged with the BCCSA against MultiChoice channel 171 for broadcasting an episode of American Monster that was allegedly inappropriate for children and without sufficient warnings on 13 February 2026 at 16:25. CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION

By |2026-04-16T09:36:58+02:00April 16th, 2026|Multichoice|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 07/A/2026 – HERBERT VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 171 – WATERSHED

ADJUDICATION NO: 05/A/2026 – MOSIA VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 – HATE SPEECH

A complaint was lodged with the BCCSA against the broadcast of Zimoja Daily on Moja Love (Multichoice Channel 157). The complaint concerns an episode of Zimoja Daily broadcast on 5 February 2026 on Moja Love (Channel 157), in which the host of the programme made statements about Dr Martin Nsibirwa. The complainant submits that the [...]

By |2026-04-16T09:32:36+02:00April 16th, 2026|Multichoice|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 05/A/2026 – MOSIA VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 – HATE SPEECH

CASE NUMBER: 01/2026 – MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 VS MPHUTHI – HATE SPEECH BASED ON GENDER

APPEAL TRIBINAL - The first principle underlying the doctrine of precedent in our courts, namely uniformity between decisions of the higher and lower rungs of adjudication, is as important in the BCCSA adjudication hierarchy as it is in the formal court system.  The second principle of equality, that of treating like cases alike, is too. [...]

By |2026-03-22T11:24:30+02:00March 22nd, 2026|Multichoice|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 01/2026 – MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 VS MPHUTHI – HATE SPEECH BASED ON GENDER

CASE NUMBER: 13/2025 – MPHUTHI VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 – HATE SPEECH BASED ON GENDER

The Complainant held the view that the continued broadcast of the programme despite the huge public uproar throughout the years constituted incitement to cause harm. The Respondent presented hate speech arguments and did not  focus on the impact of the continued broadcast. Despite having alluded to the corrective interventions the Respondent did not present the [...]

By |2026-03-22T11:15:25+02:00March 22nd, 2026|Multichoice|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 13/2025 – MPHUTHI VS MULTICHOICE CHANNEL 157 – HATE SPEECH BASED ON GENDER

ADJUDICATION NO: 06/A/2026- THE NEO BLACK MOVEMENT AFRICA, OF SOUTH AFRICA (NBM) VS eNCA – BALANCE

 Complaint that no opportunity for a reply or opposing view was provided during or soon after the broadcast of an investigative documentary programme which contained alleged inaccurate facts that allegedly distorted the reality of the situation and damaged reputation.   CLICK TO VIEW FULL ADJUDICATION

By |2026-03-22T11:11:23+02:00March 22nd, 2026|E-TV|Comments Off on ADJUDICATION NO: 06/A/2026- THE NEO BLACK MOVEMENT AFRICA, OF SOUTH AFRICA (NBM) VS eNCA – BALANCE

CASE NUMBER: 16/2025 – LORGAT VS SABC SAFM – BALANCE

The complainant filed a complaint regarding three broadcasts that reported on the capture of a Flotilla by Israel, which included South African activists. In each broadcast, an interview was conducted with an Israeli spokesperson. A few days later, an interview was conducted with a Palestinian spokesperson, but the discussion was focused on the ceasefire. An [...]

By |2026-02-20T08:16:27+02:00February 20th, 2026|SABC Radio|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 16/2025 – LORGAT VS SABC SAFM – BALANCE
Go to Top