Complaint of objectionable broadcast where it was stated that the Deputy President should “have his
penis cut off” in a controversial programme known for its irreverent character. Complainant complained that the words were “utterly obscene”, “highly insensitive”, “extremely offensive” and “unfair”. Limits to freedom of expression discussed. Such material not normally in contravention of the Code of Conduct, only when used in programmes specially designed for children or where large numbers of children are likely to be part of the audience. Infringement of dignity discussed. Even if Complainant had complained that the dignity of the Deputy President had been infringed, could Tribunal not make a finding because the Deputy President did not himself complain. Complaint not upheld.
CASE NUMBER: 16/2005 – RAMASIKE – 94.7 HIGHVELD STEREO – UNFAIR COMMENT AND OR DIGNITY
[2005] JOL 22860 (BCTSA)