Complaint that news item selectively abridged to exclude Complainant’s contribution in the interview regarding a televisionnews item.  Complainant aggrieved, and arguing that the news item is biased, sensational, distorted and untruthful- Held that broadcaster has an unfettered editorial prerogative which supersedes the Complainant’s views regarding the focus of a news report.

[2008] JOL 22856 (BCTSA)

CLICK TO VIEW FULL JUDGMENT  Case-No-51-2005