News item stating that two politicians were “prevented” from addressing students found   televisionto be erroneous in itself.  However, other visuals and commentary corrected the absolute nature of the word “prevented”.

Held furthermore that since the focus was on the disruptive element, the meagre reference to  the interest of the majority of students present was understandable in terms of the Code.  SABC however criticised for not having given more prominence to this aspect.

CLICK TO VIEW FULL JUDGMENT