CASE NO: 03/2011 – KEBONEILWE VS SABC2 – HATE SPEECH

A broadcast by the Respondent wherein a programme presenter used the word “Makula” (Coolies) to refer to people of Indian descent.   The Tribunal held that the word “coolie”, given its historical apartheid context, amounted to a serious impairment of dignity by way of hate speech based on race. The tribunal also found that the word [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:23+02:00March 13th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NO: 03/2011 – KEBONEILWE VS SABC2 – HATE SPEECH

CASE NO: 04/2011 – TAYLOR AND PILLAY VS SABC2 – VIOLENCE

Two complaints were lodged with the BCCSA concerning a promo that showed scenes from real-life CCV footage of the sound of gunshots, a woman’s voice crying and “thieves” pointing their guns at victims during robberies in banks and shops. Though the violence portrayed was alleged to be essential to the development of a character and [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:23+02:00March 13th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NO: 04/2011 – TAYLOR AND PILLAY VS SABC2 – VIOLENCE

CASE NO: 23/2011 – DR. BOOL SMUTS (LANDMARK FOUNDATION) VS SABC 2 – RIGHT TO REPLY

The complaint concerns a FOKUS programme in which the SABC allegedly did not grant The Landmark Foundation Trust a fair and reasonable opportunity to reply to allegations made against it by farmers concerning the issue of compensation for livestock losses as a result of leopard killings.  The Complainant is of the view that the SABC [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:30+02:00March 12th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NO: 23/2011 – DR. BOOL SMUTS (LANDMARK FOUNDATION) VS SABC 2 – RIGHT TO REPLY

CASE NO: 32/2011 – LEGALWISE VS SABC2 – RIGHT TO REPLY

Legalwise, an insurer of legal costs, complained that the SABC, in its Speak Out programme had omitted to convey to viewers that it had no legal obligation to hand a cheque for damages won in a legal suit to a person whom it had insured against legal costs. It had merely done so on camera [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:32+02:00March 12th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NO: 32/2011 – LEGALWISE VS SABC2 – RIGHT TO REPLY

CASE NO: 36/2011 – KLEYNHANS AND ROSENBERG VS SABC2 – CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

Complaint about a programme where the views of a pacifist Palestinian, Ali, were not countered, not upheld. The Tribunal agreed with the complainant that the relationship between Israel and the Palestinians is a controversial one. Ali’s views are, however, his own views and do not elevate the debate, as presented in this programme, to the [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:33+02:00March 12th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NO: 36/2011 – KLEYNHANS AND ROSENBERG VS SABC2 – CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

CASE NO: 11/2010 – J MAGEE- FERREIRA (HIGH PRIEST OF STARWOLVES COVEN) VS SABC2 –

Complaint about segment containing alleged hate speech against Pagan Witches. Complainant concerned that Witches have been negatively stereotyped and that a link between witches and evil in a popular programme such as 50/50 could lead to renewed witch persecutions and witch hunts.   The Tribunal held that presenters may express opinions as long as they are [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:34+02:00March 12th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NO: 11/2010 – J MAGEE- FERREIRA (HIGH PRIEST OF STARWOLVES COVEN) VS SABC2 –

CASE NO: 02/2010 – W LOMBAARD VS SABC2 AND GREEN AND MEYER VS SABC3 – CHILDREN

Similar complaints were lodged with the BCCSA in both cases, namely that adult material was broadcast at a time when children were part of the audience.  The representative of both television channels of the SABC admitted that the channels had violated the Code of Conduct.  The representative of both channels apologised for the infringements of [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:47:37+02:00March 12th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NO: 02/2010 – W LOMBAARD VS SABC2 AND GREEN AND MEYER VS SABC3 – CHILDREN

CASE NUMBER: 12/2009 – AFRIFORUM AND D CRONJE VS SABC2 AND SABC3 – TSWANE

AfriForum, a civil rights initiative, complained that the Respondent, by using the term Tshwane in its news broadcasts, was treating Pretoria differently and unequally to other cities in South Africa.  This, according to the complaint, was unfair reporting and it constituted a contravention of clauses 34.1 and 34.3 of the Code.  It appeared that Respondent, [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:48:06+02:00January 30th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 12/2009 – AFRIFORUM AND D CRONJE VS SABC2 AND SABC3 – TSWANE

CASE NUMBER: 29/2009 – SABC2 VS MOLLENTZE – CRUDE LANGUAGE

The word “fuckin” was heard by the complainant in a promo for a comedy. The promo was broadcast during a soap in family viewing time. The BCCSA Adjudicator’s decision was that the word was “fuckin” and that it was unacceptable at that time of the evening. The SABC was reprimanded.  On appeal the SABC argued [...]

By |2017-01-27T11:48:07+02:00January 30th, 2015|SABC 2|Comments Off on CASE NUMBER: 29/2009 – SABC2 VS MOLLENTZE – CRUDE LANGUAGE
Go to Top