The Appellant appealed an adjudication that the broadcaster contravened Clauses 28.3.1 and 28.3.2 of the Code in that the broadcaster did not achieve balance during a discussion of a controversial issue of public importance and that a right of reply was not offered to the Respondent. The Tribunal found that the broadcaster’s efforts to achieve balance was inadequate. The broadcaster repeated its offer to a right of reply (which had previously been declined by the Respondent, during the hearing. Respondent accepted the offer. Appeal against contravention of Clause 28.3.1 dismissed. Appeal against Clause 22.3.2 upheld.
CLICK TO VIEW FULL JUDGMENT (04) Multichoice Newzroom Afrika vs Skiti Judgment Final