Broadcast which included a fundamental error as to Christian religion found to have contravened televisionclause 12(2) of the Broadcasting Code.

The Tribunal stated the following:In the normal course, this clause has not been applied to errors in so far as religion is concerned. However, there is no reason why certain matters pertaining to religion cannot amount to matters of public importance. So as to ensure that freedom of religious expression or freedom of expression generally is not unduly limited, a narrow meaning is attached to the words “public importance”.

[1] The Tribunal is of the view that information on the Eucharist does fall within this category. The Eucharist is of particular importance to Christians and it is in the public interest that misinformation in this regard not be broadcast. [1] See Chetty vs M-Net, Case No 41/2012

Complaint upheld.

[2013] JOL 30122 (BCCSA)

CLICK TO VIEW FULL JUDGMENT  Case-No-58-2012